Neutral referee for legal-AI output: flags orphan quotes and uncited claims. Not legal advice.
Maintain this server? Claim it
Call this server's tools from your browser. Nothing to install.
Requests go through mcptry because browsers can't call most MCP servers directly. Header values are sent to the server for that request only and are never stored or logged.
Tool list from our last check. Connect live to refresh it.
Return the TrustAI Verification MCP self-description: operator, what the server verifies, the public tools, the boundary it never crosses (it never adjudicates), and links to the public surfaces.
This tool takes no arguments.
Return the TrustAI Verification MCP self-description: operator, what the server verifies, the public tools, the boundary it never crosses (it never adjudicates), and links to the public surfaces.
No arguments.
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"additionalProperties": false
}Return server health: process uptime and a deterministic engine self-check (the structural detectors run on a fixed sample and return the expected flag counts). Local-only; no database on the path.
No arguments.
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"additionalProperties": false
}Return the structural checks this server performs on legal-AI output, and — explicitly — what it never claims. Information, not legal advice.
No arguments.
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {},
"additionalProperties": false
}Independently review legal text produced by ANY AI vendor for the structural red-flags behind fabrication risk: (1) orphan quotations — a quoted span with no citation in its sentence, the citation sentence after it, or its footnote; (2) uncited propositions — law stated as established (a holding cue or a settled-law phrase such as 'it is well established') with no such citation; (3) court mismatch — the text names one circuit, the cite another; (4) impossible date — a citation year in the future or before its reporter series began; (5) court/reporter mismatch — a court and reporter that cannot both be right; (6) a case name and cite matching one publicly identified as non-existent in Mata v. Avianca (S.D.N.Y. 2023). Recognizes full and short-form cites (Id., supra, Westlaw/Lexis, U.S.C., C.F.R., state codes, court rules) and footnotes; triggers in English and Spanish. Returns each flag with the exact passage, its offsets, a severity and a plain structural observation, FOR YOUR REVIEW. It is a neutral referee: it never tells you the answer is right or wrong, never adjudicates, and abstains (returns no flags) on any fault rather than fabricating one. Deterministic and local — no external lookup. (Live case-citation existence checking against CourtListener runs on the website verifier at /verify; multi-model cross-validation runs in TrustAI's document-analysis engine and the licensed pilot — neither runs on this load-safe tool.)
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| text* | string | The legal text to review (a memo, brief, or answer from any AI vendor). Max 200000 chars. |
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"text"
],
"properties": {
"text": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The legal text to review (a memo, brief, or answer from any AI vendor). Max 200000 chars."
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}