Search 30,000+ decided U.S. DOHA security-clearance decisions, cited to the public record.
Maintain this server? Claim it
Call this server's tools from your browser. Nothing to install.
Requests go through mcptry because browsers can't call most MCP servers directly. Header values are sent to the server for that request only and are never stored or logged.
Tool list from our last check. Connect live to refresh it.
How cases with a candor allegation (falsification, omission, or lack of candor) were resolved in the decided record: the favorable rate with vs without such an allegation, when the judge found a deliberate falsification vs when the applicant rebutted it, and when the applicant corrected the record before being confronted. Counts and denominators throughout. Descriptive, never a prediction.
This tool takes no arguments.
How cases with a candor allegation (falsification, omission, or lack of candor) were resolved in the decided record: the favorable rate with vs without such an allegation, when the judge found a deliberate falsification vs when the applicant rebutted it, and when the applicant corrected the record before being confronted. Counts and denominators throughout. Descriptive, never a prediction.
No arguments.
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {}
}Fetch one decided DOHA case in full: what was alleged, the judge's findings per allegation, per-guideline formal findings, outcome, judge, representation, and appeal history. Use case_id from search_cases.
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| case_id* | integer | The numeric case id from search_cases |
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"case_id"
],
"properties": {
"case_id": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "The numeric case id from search_cases"
}
}
}How much time had passed between the most recent conduct and the decision, measured from dates stated in the decisions, for the incident-type concerns (drugs, alcohol, criminal conduct, sexual behavior, protected information, IT misuse). Reports median years before favorable vs unfavorable decisions, with counts. Descriptive association, never a prediction.
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| guideline | string | Optional single concern letter to scope to: H drugs, G alcohol, J criminal, D sexual behavior, K protected information, M IT misuse |
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"guideline": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional single concern letter to scope to: H drugs, G alcohol, J criminal, D sexual behavior, K protected information, M IT misuse"
}
}
}Grant/denial statistics over decided hearing-level DOHA cases, grouped by year or by guideline, always with sample sizes. Same population rules as the site's Insights page.
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| by | string | Grouping (default year) |
| year_to | integer | |
| guideline | string | Optional single guideline letter A-M to scope to |
| year_from | integer |
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"by": {
"enum": [
"year",
"guideline"
],
"type": "string",
"description": "Grouping (default year)"
},
"year_to": {
"type": "integer"
},
"guideline": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Optional single guideline letter A-M to scope to"
},
"year_from": {
"type": "integer"
}
}
}Measured DOHA timelines: median days from Statement of Reasons to hearing and to decision, from dates stated in the decisions themselves. Optionally scoped to one decision year.
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| year | integer | Optional decision year to scope to |
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"year": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Optional decision year to scope to"
}
}
}Search 30,000+ decided public DOHA security-clearance decisions (1996 to present). Full-text query plus filters. Returns matching cases with outcome, date, guidelines, and a citable URL each.
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| level | string | Decision level |
| limit | integer | Max results, 1-25 (default 10) |
| query | string | Full-text search, e.g. "gambling debts sports betting" |
| outcome | string | Final outcome filter |
| year_to | integer | Latest decision year |
| guideline | string | Single guideline letter A-M (e.g. F = financial, B = foreign influence) |
| year_from | integer | Earliest decision year, e.g. 2020 |
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"level": {
"enum": [
"hearing",
"appeal"
],
"type": "string",
"description": "Decision level"
},
"limit": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Max results, 1-25 (default 10)"
},
"query": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Full-text search, e.g. \"gambling debts sports betting\""
},
"outcome": {
"enum": [
"granted",
"denied"
],
"type": "string",
"description": "Final outcome filter"
},
"year_to": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Latest decision year"
},
"guideline": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Single guideline letter A-M (e.g. F = financial, B = foreign influence)"
},
"year_from": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Earliest decision year, e.g. 2020"
}
}
}The most similar decided cases to a given case, ranked by how alike the ALLEGATIONS read (never by outcome). Same list shown on the case page.
| Argument | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | Max results, 1-10 (default 5) |
| case_id* | integer | The numeric case id |
{
"type": "object",
"required": [
"case_id"
],
"properties": {
"limit": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "Max results, 1-10 (default 5)"
},
"case_id": {
"type": "integer",
"description": "The numeric case id"
}
}
}